Интернаука №16 (часть3) 2020 - [34]

you like doing? Have you got a hobby? Please write and

like to speak with gesture. In foreign language lessons tell me. There are two things I don’t like. I don’t like Body language is more effective way to explain unfa-tidying up my room and cooking!

miliar or new words and phrases, especially for young LoveLucy

learners. They are keen on playing “miming game” ac-

Handout 2. Fill in the gaps. (the missing words are

tivity. I give some examples of body language expres-common and simple)

sions which are used in the classroom.

…….Anvar,

Table 1.

Non- verbal behavior

Non- verbal behavior

Interpretation

Sitting, legs apart

Open, relaxed

Arms crossed on chest

Defensiveness

Touching, slightly rubbing nose

Doubt or lying

Head resting in head, eyes down

Boredom

Open palm

Confidence

Fondling hair

Sincerity, openness

Looking down and away

disbelief

Teaching a combination of verbal and non-verbal

language learning process in general and on the stu-

aspects of communication has positive effects on the

dents’ willingness to communicate in particular.

References:

1. Language Art and Disciplines. 1980. E.M.Vereshchagin.

2. I. Yuldashev, O. Sharipova “Tilshunoslik asoslari” 2007

3. A.Abdulazizov “Tilshunoslik nazariyasiga kirish” 2018

4. Методика обучения иностранным языкам в средней школе. Рогова. Р.В

5. Электронный ресурс: www.e-library.namdu.uz

6. Электронный ресурс: www.brainyquote.com

43

Журнал «Интернаука»

№ 16 (145), часть 3, 2020 г.

COMPARISON OF ENGLISH-LANGUAGE SCIENTIFIC DISCOURSE AND RUSSIAN-LANGUAGE SCIENTIFIC DISCOURSE

Aigerim Mukanova

Master student, Karaganda State University named after E.A. Buketova,Kazakhstan, Karaganda

ABSTRACT

The article discusses the process of formation of Russian scientific discourse taking place in the Moscow state in the second half of the XVII century. The key aspects of this process are analyzed, which include the approval of the analytical type of grammatical description, the formation of a modern term system by traditional translation techniques to new types of texts. Comparison of Russian-language and English-language scientific discourse.

Keywords: scientific discourse, text, language, term, communication.

Scientific discourse is a process of creating new

is so compact that an expert reader can quickly publish

knowledge about a subject, phenomenon, their proper-

an article and get important information” [2].

ties and qualities, presented orally and defined by the Linguist I. Martinez, in turn, draws attention to the

communicative canons of scientific communication -

widespread use of impersonal constructions in academic

logical presentation, proof of the correctness and incor-

texts that “allow authors to strategically distance them-

rectness of certain provisions, the ultimate abstraction of

selves from the information they write about” [3]. Thus,

the subject of speech. We know the scientific text as a it denotes an important feature of scientific syntax in the

subject-symbolic model of discourse. Given the above,

English language tradition.

the text act as the main unit of discourse, and so we can

Basically the functional features of the English lan-

conclude that the properties of the text as a model of guage scientific discourse and language means of ex-discourse can be extended to the discourse itself. The pressing logical connections can be brought to the fol-text is a model of discourse, and its properties as parts lowing characteristics:

are transferred to the whole and vice versa. Therefore, 1) language compression (compression of a cer-considering the text, we also study the discourse, in tain material):

turn, the study of discourse without reference to the text

 use of attribute phrases (quality improvement,

will not be possible.

productivity increase, etc.);

The scientific type of discourse, on the other hand,

 replacement with infinitive constructions or

which is part of the scientific system, is a difficult cog-

subordinate clauses (energy, companies supplying etc.);

nitive structure based on the relationship reflected in the

 use of phrases with prepositions (the first step in

language between our view of the world and the repre-

finding solutions, etc.);

sentation of this view in the language, and therefore is a

 use of application phrases (In four cohorts, sci-

constituent element of the general system. Also, the

entists stated that…, etc.).

scientific type possesses a number of its own constitu-2) formality: use of formal or neutral vocabulary

tive, system-forming features that distinguish it from (discuss vs. talk about, have a look at vs. examine, etc)

other types of discourse.

[4];

Since the beginning of the 21st century, English has

 use of formal grammar (impersonal: there / it as

advanced to the role of a universal intermediary lan-a subject);

guage - linguafrank - in politics, economics, education,