Интернаука №16 (часть3) 2020 - [36]

language scientific discourse is characterized along with

ried out by the speaker or the interlocutor. Instead, we functional features that are common to all academic

use the pronoun 1 of the plural person we (the so-called

author's we), “our” possessive pronoun, verbs in the

texts, regardless of their language affiliation. At the same time, specific features that distinguish the tradi-form of the past tense of the plural or in the form of the

tions of the formation of scientific materials in English present (future simple) tense 1 or 2 of the plural[9].

from the requirements for formatting research results

Logical connections between parts of a scientific

adopted in other linguistic and cultural communities

text are expressed using introductory constructions

should be taken into account. The situation with Russian

(words, phrases and sentences) with the meaning of the

scientific discourse is slightly different.

reliability of the message: naturally, of course. Introduc-

Understanding of scientific discourse appeared in

tory words have other meanings, namely assumptions,

the late 1990s. at the scientific school of the Russian for example: probably obvious. In scientific discourse, linguist Chernyavskaya Valeria Evgenievna. The study

introductory constructions also point to a source of in-of scientific discourse has been introduced into the sys-

formation, for example: as Carl Gustav notes; according

tem of methods and principles of text linguistics and put

to Charles Darwin, etc. Using these introductory ele-

into correlation with a wide range of problems of scien-

ments, the order of thoughts and their connection is ob-

tific communication, a methodology for analyzing text

jectified, a conclusion is introduced, the degree of sig-and discourse, a methodology for researching scientific

nificance of the messages, a generalization, for example,

discourse, and an interdisciplinary assessment of the

connectivity is manifested, firstly; secondly; conse-

quality of the scientific result have been implemented.

quently; and finally.

In the linguistic - epistemic concept of Chernyavskaya N.B. Gvishiani and some other researchers distin-V.E. pointed out that the result of cognition is included

guish a separate, independent general scientific lan-

in scientific discourse in only oral (scientific communi-

guage within the framework of the style of scientific cation) or written (monograph, research article, report communication, considering it to be a historical catego-abstracts, dissertation) text [7].

ry. The general scientific style is determined by: "1) the Language as a social phenomenon performs various

development of the scientific thought of a given coun-functions related to a particular area of human activity.

try; 2) the state of the national literary language; 3) the

In the science of language, the classification of func-artistic skill of the author; 3) the intellectual level of the tional styles of the Russian language has entrenched: reader." The general scientific language varies, changes conversational style, scientific style, official-business depending on the subject of which science - humanitari-style, journalistic style, literary and artistic style. It is an or natural - is being described. The language of gen-important to understand that the style of the Russian eral scientific communication with this approach is op-language scientifically determines the content of the life

posed to the terminological language inherent in each of the language at a very high level of generalization, individual field of knowledge [10].

45

Журнал «Интернаука»

№ 16 (145), часть 3, 2020 г.

Thus, a scientific text acts as a reflection and ex-reflect the patterns of the cognitive process. The content

pression of a scientific style - a special method of cogni-

of the scientific text is revealed using various linguistic

tive and communicative - speech actions of a subject means, among which predominant are sensory (emo-who decides in the process of creating a text to com-tionally neutral), which perform representative and des-

municate new knowledge about reality and to prove the

ignating functions, which indicates the observance of

truth of this knowledge. Considering the above, the pro-

the characteristic linguistic features of the scientific cesses of text generation in scientific speech necessarily

discourse of its basic goals.

References:

1. Koyalan, A., Mumford, S. Changes to English as an Additional Language writers' research articles: From spoken to written register [Text] // English for Specific Purposes. – 2011. – № 30. – P. 113 123.

2. Biber, D., Gray, B. Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness [Text] //

Journal of English for Academic Purposes. – 2010. – № 9. – P. 2 20.