Polystoria. Цари, святые, мифотворцы в средневековой Европе - [75]

ИИД – «История» Иоанна Драсханакертского (Иованнес Драсхана-кертци. История Армении / пер. М.О. Дарбинян-Меликян. Ереван, 1986)

ИПБ – «История и повествование о Багратионах» Сумбата Давитисдзе (Картлис цховреба. История Грузии / гл. ред. Р. Метревели. Тбилиси, 2008. С. 221–231)

ЛК – «Летопись Картли»

ЛП – «Лаодикийское послание»

МАТ – «Мученичество Або Тбилисского» (Кекелидзе К. Памятники древнегрузинской агиографической литературы. Тбилиси, 1956. С. 31–62)

ОК – «Обращение Картли» (Обращение Грузии / пер. Е.С. Такайшвили. Тбилиси, 1989. С. 23–59)

ОР РГБ – Отдел рукописей Российской государственной библиотеки (Москва)

ОР РНБ – Отдел рукописей Российской национальной библиотеки (Санкт-Петербург)

ПСРЛ – Полное собрание русских летописей

ПЭ – Православная энциклопедия

РА – «Российская археология»

СА – «Советская археология»

ТОДРЛ – Труды Отдела древнерусской литературы

ИРЛИ РАН ЧОИДР – Чтения в Обществе истории и древностей российских

CFHB – Corpus fontium historiae Byzantinae CSCO – Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium

DA – Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters

DAI–Constantinus Porphyrogenitus. De administrando imperio (Constantine Porphyrogenitus. De Administrando Imperio / ed. by G. Moravcsik, transl. by R.J.H. Jenkins. Washington, D.C., 1966)

De cer. – De ceremoniis

FMASt – Frühmittelalterliche Studien

FSGA – Ausgewählte Quellen zur deutschen Geschichte des Mittelalters. Freiherr vom Stein-Gedächtnisausgabe

JGO – Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas. Neue Folge LexMA – Lexikon des Mittelalters MGH – Monumenta Germaniae Historica Neer. – Necrologia Germaniae SS – Scriptores (in folio)

SS rer. Germ. – Scriptores rerum Germanicarum ad usum scholarum separatim editi

SS rer. Germ. N.S. – Scriptores rerum Germanicarum. Nova series

MPH NS – Monumenta Poloniae Historica – Pomniki dziejowe Polski. Nova series

PMbZ – Prosopographie der mittelbyzantnischen Zeit SBS – Studies in Byzantine Sigillography

Theophanes – Theophanis chronographia / ed. C. de Boor. Vol. 1. Lipsiae, 1883

ZHF – Zeitschrift für historische Forschung

Авторский коллектив

Михаил Анатольевич Бойцов – д.и.н., профессор Школы исторических наук, заведующий Научно-учебной лабораторией медиеви-стических исследований НИУ ВШЭ.

Андрей Юрьевич Виноградов – к.и.н., доцент Школы исторических наук, с.н.с. Научно-учебной лаборатории медиевистических исследований НИУ ВШЭ.

Олег Сергеевич Воскобойников – к.и.н., PhD, доцент Школы исторических наук, с.н.с. Научно-учебной лаборатории медиевистических исследований НИУ ВШЭ.

Михаил Владимирович Дмитриев – д.и.н., профессор исторического факультета МГУ им. М.В. Ломоносова, в.н.с. Научно-учебной лаборатории медиевистических исследований НИУ ВШЭ.

Анна Феликсовна Литвина – к.ф.н., доцент Школы филологии, в.н.с. Лаборатории лингвосемиотических исследований НИУ ВШЭ.

Александр Васильевич Назаренко – д.и.н., гл.н.с. Института всеобщей истории РАН, руководитель Центра истории религии и церкви Института российской истории РАН, в 2014 г. – приглашенный гл.н.с. Научно-учебной лаборатории медиевистических исследований НИУ ВШЭ.

Фёдор Борисович Успенский – д.ф.н., зам. директора Института славяноведения РАН, в.н.с. Научно-учебной лаборатории медиевистических исследований НИУ ВШЭ.

Светлана Александровна Яцык – стажер-исследователь Научноучебной лаборатории медиевистических исследований НИУ ВШЭ.

Abstracts

Andrei Vinogradov

The Kingdom of Abkhazia as a Case of Politogenesis between Christianity and Islam (the Late 8^th – Early 10^th Century)

The article is dedicateded to the case of the Kingdom of Abkhazia as an experience of politogenesis in the contact zone between Christianity and Islam. Emerged due to the falling away from Byzantine suzerainty the Kingdom of Abkhazia continued to keep his commitment to Christianity until the establishment of his own Church and missionary activities in the Caucasus. To maintain its independence, the Abkhazian Kingdom was forced to resort, like Byzantium, temporary alliances with various neighbouring states (Khazar khaganate, Bagratids principalities, etc.). One of the major challenges for the Abkhazian kings was to overcome the internal fragmentation provoked by heterogeneous ethnic and political nature of their Kingdom.

Anna Litvina, Fjodor Uspenskij

The Ruler and His Namesakes

in the North and in the East of Europe

Dynastic life in medieval Europe was subject to a complex network of norms, rules, and prohibitions. Some of these were recorded in writing, although, as a rule, with a significant delay, when the rules themselves were about to fall out of use. Others, despite remaining unwritten, regulated many aspects of everyday dynastic life, which repeatedly confirmed their existence. One of the spheres regulated by such unwritten but very effective norms was that of name-giving. Based on evidence from various European royal courts between the 9^th and early 13^th centuries, we can identify a set of parameters according to which names could be given to members of the ruling family and establish which of these parameters were relevant to each dynasty. These structural links are of interest in themselves, both for creating a comprehensive dynastic portrait, be it of the rulers of France, Hungary, Poland, Rus or Scandinavia, and for identifying certain legal relations with the help of proper nouns. The following are perhaps the most significant and systemic parameters, which determined all others: Could a new member of a dynasty receive the name of his living father or grandfather and Could dynastic names be widely used outside a dynasty? In the Middle Ages, newborns in all European ruling families were most likely to receive the names of their ancestors. The question is whether the names of living relatives could be used, or whether, based on vestigial archaic notions about a kind of reincarnation of an ancestor in his progeny, only the names of dead ancestors could be used.