Guilt By Degrees - [9]
“No clue,” I said, shaking my head.
“Phil Hemet,” Toni replied.
“You’ve got to be kidding,” I said, stricken. “The idiot who lost the only case he ever tried?” I fished through my memory. “A caught-inside-the-car joyriding case.”
“A genius he ain’t,” Toni agreed. “But he’s a world-class brownnoser.”
“Right. Got promoted to director of central operations at one point, didn’t he?”
“Yeah,” Toni snorted. “And on his way up, he headed Special Trials for about five minutes.”
“Thank God we weren’t around for that. But how did they let a fool like that run a unit like Special Trials?”
“How do they do anything around here?”
The clerk pushed the complaint for my case over to me, and I stopped to sign it.
“I will tell you this, though,” Toni said. “I heard that the deputies in the unit gave him endless shit. Refused to talk to him about their cases, never listened to a word he said, and if he called a meeting, no one would show. They’d all say they had to be in court.” Toni recounted the story with relish.
“Sounds like good, responsible lawyering on their part,” I replied.
“Most definitely,” Toni agreed. “But you know who demoted his ass?”
I shook my head.
“Your buddy, District Attorney Vanderhorn,” she said.
“Nooo!” I replied, truly shocked.
Toni held up her hand. “If I’m lyin’, I’m flyin’.”
Vanderhorn and I were like oil and water. He thought I was insubordinate and unpredictable. I thought he was a boneheaded politico with no legal skills whatsoever. On any given day, we could both be right. But apparently he’d had a rare fit of good judgment where Hemet was concerned.
“Well, you know what they say…”
“Yeah, I do, so spare me,” Toni said, knowing what was coming.
I continued, undaunted. “Even a clock that’s broken is right twice a day.”
Toni walked out ahead of me, muttering to herself-something about gagging.
7
I knew the defense would jam me into the earliest possible date for the preliminary hearing, which meant I wouldn’t have much time to pull everything together. From what I’d heard in court, and the flimsiness of the file in my hand, there was still a lot of work to do, not the least of which was to figure out who my victim, currently listed as “John Doe,” was. So I turned down Toni’s offer to hit Little Tokyo for a sushi lunch and grabbed a no-guilt turkey-and-lettuce sandwich to eat at my desk while I worked.
By the time I settled in and spread out the file, the eighteenth floor was largely deserted. Quiet and empty, just the way I liked it. I shoved the murder book onto the table next to the window and tried not to look at the teetering pile of other murder books and case files that were starting to impinge on my treasured ninety-degree view. I opened the bottom drawer of my desk, dropped my purse on top of the bottle of Glenlivet, and propped my feet up on the edge of the drawer.
I flipped open the slender file. My John Doe had been walking north on Hope-insert irony here-between Fourth and Fifth Street, when he lunged out and grabbed a woman’s arm. They struggled for a moment, and that’s where the narrative got murky. Either she broke free and then the victim fell to the ground, or he fell to the ground and then she got loose. The report quoted witness Charlie Fern as saying that the defendant, Ronald Yamaguchi, was standing right next to John Doe, so he had to have done the stabbing, though Fern hadn’t exactly seen it.
It was an interesting twist on what Fern had said in court. Not so much a contradiction as a difference in emphasis. The gap was right there in plain sight: he “hadn’t exactly seen” the stabbing. Why he’d shaved down his statement in court was anybody’s guess. Taking the oath can make witnesses nervous, but it was equally possible that Fern had exaggerated what he’d seen when he’d spoken to the cops. Regardless, the statement itself gave fair warning of a possible problem, and a prosecutor who was paying attention would’ve noticed that and either taken some time to interview Fern before the prelim or at least anticipated a possible snag on the witness stand. In other words, if “I could give a shit” Brandon Averill had been doing his job instead of his hair, he would’ve made sure the cop who took that report had his butt firmly planted in the seat next to him before he even thought about announcing “ready” in court.
As a general rule, I don’t like to second-guess fellow deputies. No one but the trial deputy really knows what’s going on, and sometimes his smartest moves are the ones he doesn’t make. But there was no benefit of the doubt to be given here. Not after what I’d seen in the report. I had no doubt that Stoner was telling the truth and Averill had forgotten to issue the subpoena.
So how had Fern fingered Yamaguchi for the police in the first place if, as Fern claimed, he didn’t know Yamaguchi?
I quickly paged over to the arrest report. Apparently Yamaguchi had been in the crowd of gawkers who’d gathered when the police had finally been called to the scene. Charlie’d noticed him there and pointed him out. Odd. Why would Yamaguchi return to the scene when he’d gotten away free and clear? Then again, he wouldn’t be the first defendant to get off on watching the police work the crime scene he’d created.
First in a new series from bestselling author and famed O. J. Simpson trial prosecutor Marcia Clark, a "terrific writer and storyteller" (James Patterson).Samantha Brinkman, an ambitious, hard-charging Los Angeles criminal defense attorney, is struggling to make a name for herself and to drag her fledgling practice into the big leagues. Sam lands a high-profile double-murder case in which one of the victims is a beloved TV star – and the defendant is a decorated veteran LAPD detective. It promises to be exactly the kind of media sensation that would establish her as a heavy hitter in the world of criminal law.Though Sam has doubts about his innocence, she and her two associates (her closest childhood friend and a brilliant ex-con) take the case.
In Marcia Clark's most electrifying thriller yet, Los Angeles District Attorney Rachel Knight investigates a horrifying high school massacre.A Columbine-style shooting at a high school in the San Fernando Valley has left a community shaken to its core. Two students are identified as the killers. Both are dead, believed to have committed a mutual suicide.In the aftermath of the shooting, LA Special Trials prosecutor Rachel Knight teams up with her best girlfriend, LAPD detective Bailey Keller. As Rachel and Bailey interview students at the high school, they realize that the facts don't add up.
Without a Doubt is not just a book about a trial. It's a book about a woman. Marcia Clark takes us inside her head and her heart. Her voice is raw, incisive, disarming, unmistakable. Her story is both sweeping and deeply personal. It is the story of a woman who, when caught up in an event that galvanized an entire country, rose to that occasion with singular integrity, drive, honesty and grace.In a case that tore America apart, and that continues to haunt us as few events of history have, Marcia Clark emerged as the only true heroine, because she stood for justice, fought the good fight, and fought it well.
TROUBLE IN PARADISE is an all-new short story featuring Rachel Knight, star of thrillers GUILT BY ASSOCIATION and GUILT BY DEGREES.Rachel Knight and her friends Toni and Bailey are taking a break from their busy, crime-focussed lives with a trip to tropical island paradise Aruba. But trouble is never far away from these three, and on their first day their investigative skills are called on when a reality TV child star goes missing…
When the daughter of a billionaire Hollywood director is found murdered after what appears to be a kidnapping gone wrong, Los Angeles Special Trials prosecutor Rachel Knight and Detective Bailey Keller find themselves at the epicenter of a combustible and high-profile court case.Then a prime suspect is revealed to be one of Hollywood's most popular and powerful talent managers-and best friend to the victim's father.With the director vouching for the manager's innocence, the Hollywood media machine commences an all-out war designed to discredit both Rachel and her case.KILLER AMBITION is at once a thrilling ride through the darker side of Tinseltown and a stunning courtroom drama with the brilliant insider's perspective that Marcia Clark is uniquely qualified to give.
В жизни многих людей иногда наступают минуты, когда без дружеской поддержки — хоть головой в омут. Тонкие психологи, строители очередных финансовых «пирамид» взяли на вооружение и этот «пограничный момент» в сознании растерянного человека, чтобы использовать его в своих корыстных целях. А то, что при этом рушатся чьи-то жизни, происходят самоубийства, — никого не касается. Таково, по их убеждению, время, в котором каждый сам за себя…
В прошлый раз только чудо спасло красотку Лану Красич от страшного жертвоприношения на алтаре в центре древнего лабиринта. И вот снова на Олешином острове происходит что-то неладное. Неужели опять всему виной языческий культ?.. Лана не желает верить во всю эту мистическую чушь, но друзей и ее саму продолжают преследовать жуткие злоключения. Возлюбленному Ланы Кириллу Витке внезапно становится плохо, и его срочно увозят на «Скорой» в неизвестном направлении, и потом никто не может найти больницу, куда его поместили.
Глубоко в Уральских горах в секретных лабораториях члены нацистской организации «Аненербе» пытаются вывести идеальных арийцев, которые в будущем подчинят себе весь мир. Ученые значительно преуспели в этом, один такой совершенный экземпляр уже имеется. Теперь же их основной задачей является получение от красавца Кая идеального потомства. Но удавшийся генетический эксперимент ни в коем случае не желает становиться самцом‑производителем расы «господ» и всячески уворачивается от выполнения супружеского долга с совершеннейшей из женщин.
Классический английский детектив: преступление и расследование. Место действия — приморская гостиница, время — первая треть 20 века.Преступление в Линден-Сэндзе расследуется троицей, весьма характерной для истории криминалистики и ее отражения в английской детективной литературе: сыщик-любитель Уэндовер, полицейский инспектор Армадейл и центральная фигура, уравновешивающая двух сыщиков — сэр Клинтон Дриффилд.Вышел в Англии в 1928 году.
Шарль Эксбрая наряду с Ж. Сименоном, С.-А. Стееманом и Л. Тома является крупнейшим мастером детектива во французской литературе XX века. Опубликовав более сотни романов, он добился общеевропейской, а к началу 70-х годов и всемирной популярности. Прозу Эксбрая отличают мастерски выстроенный сюжет, в основе которого обычно лежит кошмарное преступление, неожиданные повороты событий, зловещая атмосфера тайны, раскрывающейся лишь на последних страницах. Книги Эксбрая написаны прекрасным прозрачным языком, с истинно французским вкусом и юмором.
В книге рассказывается история главного героя, который сталкивается с различными проблемами и препятствиями на протяжении всего своего путешествия. По пути он встречает множество второстепенных персонажей, которые играют важные роли в истории. Благодаря опыту главного героя книга исследует такие темы, как любовь, потеря, надежда и стойкость. По мере того, как главный герой преодолевает свои трудности, он усваивает ценные уроки жизни и растет как личность.